12-24-2017, 01:32 PM
(12-24-2017, 07:12 AM)heron Wrote: Anyone who is "attacking"Jamie is speaking to his actions re: the harassment of those three women. By many accounts, and I mean MANY, he did not acquit himself well. At all. What he tries to do is wonderful, but his reaction to all that happened was SO not.I do not know any of the parties involved, but from what I have been reading here, Jamie was "not" the culprit, and IMO, had no need to acquit himself. His camera man, on the other hand, is the one who's name should be mentioned as opposed to Jamie's. Irreparable damage could be the result of continuous use of his name being associated with this sort of behavior.
Sometimes I think I would agree with bleeps method. Any of the men folk I might hang around with have a code that would not bode well for skunks that are caught in the hen house.
Meanwhile, I suggest that everybody relax and wait until the information is assembled before judging anybody on second and third hand hearsay.
The Captain and Crew Finally got their stuff together.
Now if they can only remember where they put it.
Now if they can only remember where they put it.


![[-]](https://vandwellerforum.com/images/collapse.png)