Moving on to battery monitors.
I purchased this unit:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/173058142084
Wireless Battery Monitor Meter DC 120V 300A VOLT AMP AH SOC Remaining Capacity
I set the monitor to 200AH capacity. The Hall effect unit is mounted on the bank's negative cable.
I had charged each 100AH AGM separately on a PD60 charger before installing and connecting the solar chargers.
Everyday the controllers complete charging around 1200-1300. Still plenty of solar until 1400-1500 that is going unused except as replacement under load.
The monitor does not show the bank as ever getting back to 200AH.
Everyday somewhat lower ( ~ -20 AH) than the day before.
Yet the voltage under load at night is 12.6-12.7 the low at 12.5. Rebounding a tenth or two as soon as the load is off.
Though the monitor does not think the bank is full, I'm fairly sure it is.
Putting the PD60 on after dark gives a burst of amps about 20 at first, then very quickly, less than a minute, settles down to 1+ amp. The PD60 thinks the bank is full.
Is 200AH the wrong value for a bank of two 100AH AGMs?
Get a different, more $, battery monitor? Would a shunt unit be better? My first impression of a shunt back in 2015 was that it was something else to get in the way of electrons freely flowing. That impression is being overwritten, but the no touch Hall effect seems better, but not if it cannot function as expected.
I like the kind of monitor that I have, as it uses WI-fi to communicate with the display unit. I can observe the system running next door in my Tioga MH, while I am in my Tahoe TT. Unnecessary when I am dispersed in the MH, but very useful at home when testing and tuning.