06-26-2019, 09:00 AM
Read with the whole article, it's not that murky. It is a science paper. It basically states they couldn't find much difference between victims who used a tourniquet and those who didn't. Practically speaking, the risk of a poorly applied tourniquet wasn't worth the risk.
I'm not sure exactly what they mean by low quality data. I can take an educated guess and imagine they are wishing they could have people get bit in a controlled environment. I could be wrong. I'm not educated and horrible at guessing.
I'm not sure exactly what they mean by low quality data. I can take an educated guess and imagine they are wishing they could have people get bit in a controlled environment. I could be wrong. I'm not educated and horrible at guessing.


![[-]](https://vandwellerforum.com/images/collapse.png)